Hi Anonymous! Login or signup to access your account.
|
MEMBERS
|
| Currently there are 207 users online. |
|
Coffee and Chaos : Anonymous Inc. Contributed by apocalypse (Edited by ) Sunday, March 20, 2005 @ 12:00:06 AM Print | Send
|
Thousands of lives have become an open book.
Thanks to personal websites oddly called blogs. Humdrum writers, wanting ego massage, post their daily thoughts, their day-to-day experiences, and literary attempts in their blogs. One thinks about a random thought, then s/he enters it in his blog. One reads someone’s exegeses, then s/he posts a comment. Definitely, blogging has become this decade’s robotic yet addictive habit.
According to Dave Winer, one of the pioneers of blogging, weblogs or simply, blogs are “often-updated [internet] sites that point to articles elsewhere on the web, often with comments and to on-site articles.” Simply put, blogs are personal websites with links to your friends, thus making an intricate web of thousands of “netizens” reading and cross-reading other blogs.
Nobody is sure who set up the first blog or why is it called such. A quick Google search would yield minimal information about the history of blogging. They only say the same thing: blogging started in 1997 and flourished in 1999 when Blogger.com offered free weblog service to the public.
Of Blogs and Politics
The most controversial of all forms are political blogs – set-up by bloggers who use it as a political tool to criticize the existing status quo, which is the hegemonic flow of information controlled by the mass media.
Political blogs gained increasing notice and coverage for their role in breaking, shaping or spinning news stories. Blog authors link several articles from news web sites and post it in their blogs with corresponding comments. According to a political blogger, they mostly criticize what they consider as systematic errors or bias in an online newspaper or news site.
Political blogs gained unexpected prominence during President Bush’s War on Iraq. These blogs provided a counter-point, as well as counter-weight, as bloggers, and even journalists covering the war, gathered news and posted “on-the-spot” reportage on the war, giving flesh to the “real horrible face” of the war.
Likewise, blogs have become an alternative venue for dissent and protest. K Marx the Spot, for example, is a progressive blog that became a space for critiques and leftist commentaries about politics, economics and culture submitted by liberal journalists across the globe.
Interestingly, most of these sites are digital revolution advocates, promoting alternative softwares, which provide free source codes, like Linux, Mozilla and Firefox instead of Microsoft software applications. They believe that softwares should be shared and acquired freely and free from capitalistic clutches.
A Blog Life
But the sudden exponential gush of new blogs and authors/journalists rendered the network of blogs unnavigable. Instead of browsing on all alternative sources of news, one is forced to just click CNN.com. Thus, the power, or potential, of the blogs to become a site of debate and contestation is easily negated because of its sheer number and convoluted network.
Unfortunately in the Philippines, there are few blogs that have political content. Most Philippine blog authors are still pajama-writers, writing their own day-to-day experiences and mundane existence – who is their crush, what they ate last night, where did they go. And would go on writing why they felt bad yesterday, what they are looking forward tomorrow and, sometimes, their answers to countless and mindless surveys and questionnaires usually found in Friendster.com or e-groups.
One time, during one of those lazy afternoons where I have nothing to do but surf the net, I read one post of a blogger who was so pissed-off and so antsy because she applied first the conditioner before the shampoo. And I was like, “What the?” Now that was a concrete proof of misplaced existential angst coupled with twisted values plus a tinge of incongruous vanity.
As I see it, all these self-glorifications and me-I-centric musings are nothing but pure masturbation and ego-massage. Such bloggers are then reduced to just another senseless writer – anonymous and voiceless.
################
###############
I admit I am one of those faceless pajama-writers/bloggers before. But I kissed blogging goodbye simply because I realized it was senseless for me to maintain an online diary or a blog. I’d rather pour my thoughts in a piece of paper, where it is private and for my eyes only. I firmly believe that a blog should be a medium for change and a space for debate and contestation of pressing social issues that concern us and the nation.
|
|  | Columns - Coffee and Chaos
 Related links
 |
|
|
|
| Coffee and Chaos : Anonymous Inc. | 68 comments | | | |
|
Re: Iba kumpara sa iba mong sinusulat dito. by Handyfemme Sunday, March 20, 2005 @ 01:58:44 AM
 | :)
"I firmly believe that a blog should be a medium for change and a space for debate and contestation of pressing social issues that concern us and the nation."
I was once a pajama blogger too. That was way back 2001-2002 when I was still in high school. After changing different blogging tools, learning html, I also learned how to grow and my entries somewhat changed. Sure, I still blog about what's happening around me (like anong nangyayari sa school, ano yung napapansin ko, etc.) but my entries evolved from having mala-teenybopper feel to entries having, well enough substance (Naks substance daw!) like bakit iba na ang kulturang pinapractice ng mga tao abroad, bakit pangit yung ganitong film, bakit maganda ang book na ito, etc.
And I stopped writing on my friends-only online journal; bumalik na ako sa pagsusulat longhand. :)
Miss na kita kuya! Maligayang pagbabalik. Usap tayo kapag di na ako busy. ;)
|
|
disagree by lagsh Sunday, March 20, 2005 @ 07:49:54 AM
 | I disagree a lot. I believe blogging is free-for-all, therefore, a blogger's entries, no matter how mundane, should not be condemned.
a blogger is not obliged to be sensible. sensibility is an option in blogging in my opinion.
i firmly believe a blog's contents is subject to the owner's choice: will it be a political blog? an online diary? a satirical blog? a serial blog?
|
|
- i agree... by seminarista on Sunday, March 20, 2005 @ 10:26:25 AM
- Re: by apocalypse on Monday, March 21, 2005 @ 09:10:19 PM
- i 'blog' kasi.. by orionspear on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 @ 04:31:43 AM
- Re: none of the above by seminarista on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 @ 11:57:33 AM
- Re: by Qo_Shan on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 @ 06:26:28 PM
Re: to each his own by weng93 Sunday, March 20, 2005 @ 10:56:15 AM
 | you really woudn't appreciate it if you just randomly surf blogs of strangers and try to make sense out of what they're so 'angsty' about. no post is 'mundane', as far as the blogger is concerned. like this piece for example, it appears too myopic for me whereas you feel so strong about your contention.
the unique thing about blogging is that you see different personalities of friends (operative term, people you know) that we sometimes fail to see amidst the smothering blur of pretense.
it's a form of personal expression that is not meant to be rammed down anyone's throat. =D
|
|
dagdag sa comment ni lagsh by xeean Monday, March 21, 2005 @ 12:20:09 AM
 | ye, choice naman ng blogger yun.
kung di mo trip yung nababasa mo sa ibang blogs, may choice ka rin naman na i-close ang window at lumipad sa ibang blogs.
kaya nga free ang blogging chorva dahil para ito sa lahat ng may nais ilabas na 'kahit ano'.
"I firmly believe that a blog should be a medium for change and a space for debate and contestation of pressing social issues that concern us and the nation." << hindi naman ako against diyan sa sinabi mo.
Pero since ang blogs ay nasa Internet--sa World Wide Web, hindi mawawala ang mga senseless shit na nakakalat. Marami rin namang senseless websites diba? parang ganoon na rin 'yon kung ikukumpara sa blogs. Hindi rin naman lahat ng tao may pakielam sa pulitika.
pis! ;)
|
|
Hmmm... walang pakialamanan... nasa nagbabasa yan... by DooDong Monday, March 21, 2005 @ 12:56:28 AM
 | Hindi naman ginawa ang blog solely for an "intellectual" purpose na gusto mong iparating... Basahin mo pa sa mismong site ng blogger!
|
|
Yet another SRA at Peyups.com by elfili Monday, March 21, 2005 @ 06:13:32 AM
 | SRA= Self Righteous A**hole.
|
|
- Re: hahahahahahaha by foolmars on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 @ 04:57:05 PM
- my 6 cents.... by apocalypse on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 @ 08:52:04 PM
- Re: by foolmars on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 @ 11:46:18 AM
- Re: by foolmars on Wednesday, March 30, 2005 @ 10:06:42 PM
my point is..... by apocalypse Monday, March 21, 2005 @ 10:48:05 AM
 | | I knew that the article will receive negative comments (in fact, i expected worse). but don't worry, i respect all your views. After all, we live in a democratic world ...
1. @elfili: I am not a self righteous a******. I am not a holier-than-thou person who see himself highly. I have my own flaws and you have your own... This is my opinion, and this is how I see the world... If you don't like it, then fine. I am not ramming it down in your throat to agree with what I believe... The last thing I want to be is a sanctimonious b@stard…
2. Yes, blogs are our own little space in the intricate web. A personal space we made public. In fact our blogs mirror our personality. a glimpse of what we are... of what we believe...
Our blogs is the expression of our “self”. I have nothing against to those who love to chronicle their lives, and letting their lives become an open book. There is nothing wrong with that.. and besides its your own space, yours and yours alone….
In fact, I have nothing against to those who love to write about themselves. There is no contest with that. But I guess, we are missing the point of the article, its thesis…
As Karl Marx once said, the point is to change it. So, how can we move forward from writting about our own mundane existence into something that is socially relevant?
In my opinion, the blogger must transform him/herself from just an ordinary blogger to a responsible blogger who wants to change the system. Change the world, Eric Clapton sang in one of his memorable song.
I think the most essential question that we, as bloggers and as Filipino citizens, must answer is: How can we help in nation-building?
Trust me, I am no idealist. I always believe that idealism is an extinct word. (In fact, my blog is titled “The Death of Idealism”)
But I believe that we, bloggers, have a manifest destiny to fulfill. We must create a space in the net where debate and social analysis are our conerstones, our own ideologies as our bibles, and our blogs as arenas where we devour, heal, create, demistify, destroy, and recreate ideas. Only through healthy exchange of ideas can we move forward as a nation.
Our blogs must be a space for coffee intellectuals to debate, articulate, ponder and write about love, life, philosophy, literature, politics and everything in between. A site where nothing is sacred. Not even the Indian sacred cows. Because everything under the sun is subject to scrutiny, debate and analysis.
Because I don’t want to be a voiceless blogger drowned by a million voices wanting to express themselves. I want to be a part of that tiny voice that soon will be a warcry, trumpeting forward towards the very center of the earth, knocking at the very doors of the status quo, of the oppressive system. Someday, we will topple them down. And now is the right time to start.
3. xeean: inuman tayo! text me na lang kung kelan. libre kita :D
4. baka akalain niyo na galit ako, hindi po ako galit o naasar :D peace!
|
|
Re: by aya_101 Monday, March 21, 2005 @ 01:31:19 PM
 | "As I see it, all these self-glorifications and me-I-centric musings are nothing but pure masturbation and ego-massage. Such bloggers are then reduced to just another senseless writer – anonymous and voiceless. "
---you say you don't have nothing against these bloggers but still you say they are self-glorifying and "me-I-centric" musers as you may call it.
And I also believe that the evolution of how we write starts from those nonsense articles you so distastefully criticize. You may have evolved being a pajama-blogger but you still have a close mind.
|
|
- Re: by apocalypse on Monday, March 21, 2005 @ 08:54:44 PM
- Re: by aya_101 on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 @ 12:08:23 PM
My own two cents' worth on blogging by solemn_noises Monday, March 21, 2005 @ 11:09:22 PM
 | Blogs are one form of masturbatory writing, wherein authors usually have the same goal, of pleasing themselves (and only themselves). If it attracts readers, good. But if it does not, damn the audience.
The world can live without blogs, like any other fads taken from "simpler" origins. We tend to have fun by complicating life, which takes everything into a complete irony.
I use my blog as a therapist, where I can cool off steam.
Filipinos have this tendency of unearthing everything about each other to the point of invading their privacy, and blogs can be a great and a non-invading-sort of snooping into what others do, so we can realize our lives are practically the same and there is no fun in messing with what one does with his/hers.
|
|
Re: yupyup by elusive Tuesday, March 22, 2005 @ 02:33:30 AM
 | i too disagree at some point.. yes, it's a great avenue for debates and such but if you'd speculate our society--the rapid number of alienated people who just wish to be heard or gain friends, the increase of internet access among homes and schools, and the efficiency of typing rather than writing laboriously, you cannot simply point out that blogging has become a strictly negative idea. and please do not generalize.. not all bloggers are "anonymous" and "voiceless". one blogger cannot interest one reader the same as another..
|
|
Re: by horned_01 Tuesday, March 22, 2005 @ 09:26:43 PM
 | I find this whole "businnes" of looking at things from purely "elitist-pseudo-intellectual-quasi-political" perspective extremely pretentious.
blogging should never, as in never ever be limited to "intellectual" (what is intellectual, anyway?), "political" (duh! i'd rather read seasoned columnists than read political "articles"/"opinions" written on blogs)
when you suscribe to the convoluted notion that blogging should exculusively be maintained/done in order to raise "political/intellectual" debates, you're actually defeating the whole essence of blogging which is to share anything as in anything at all.... and besides, many creative writters do not write about politics, etc..etc..
a creative blogger doesn't have to be limited on such "heavy" a.k.a "ka-chorvahan" topics in order to say something worth reading and knowing. one can actually talk about anything, and still able share an insight, that is oftentimes missed when one writes about...ngork-ngork topics like politics.
|
|
- Re: by apocalypse on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 @ 11:02:58 AM
- Re: by aya_101 on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 @ 12:15:10 PM
- Re: by apocalypse on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 @ 12:40:22 PM
Sino ba nagbabasa ng mga blogs? by elfili Wednesday, March 23, 2005 @ 07:21:02 AM
 | Hindi ba mga kapwa bloggers rin? Hindi ba yung mga tao rin na walang ginawa maghapon kundi mag-blog-hopping, mag-friendster, mag-download ng sandamakmak na 6 seconds porn clips, makipag-chat hanggang alas kwatro ng madaling-araw, mag-RPG online, maghanap ng downloadable MP3,...etc..etc.
Paano magiging medium of change 'yang political or "socially aware" kuno na blogs na yan, kung lahat naman ng nakaka-basa nyan eh mga armchair activists rin lang. Meron ba sa masa na makaka intindi sa mga pag-aanalisa nyo sa kanilang kalagayan? Lalo pa at high falutin words pa ang paborito nyong gamitin sa mga blogs nyo?
Kung gusto mong maging socially relevant, nasa kalsada ang tunay na laban. Mag-blog ka man maghapon tungkol sa kalagayan ni Mang Juan, walang mangyayaring pagbabago dahil ang audience mo naman ay katulad mo ring nakaupo lang sa harap ng computer. Yung mga totoong kumikilos para sa pagbabago ay wala na halos panahon para sa mga ganyang klaseng blog dahil nandoon na mismo sila kung saan may aksyon.
Sabi nga sa journalism, "The medium is the message." Ang blog bilang medium ng pagbabago ay hindi pa na-aangkop sa kalagayan ng Pinas dahil mahina pa ang IT infrastructure nito. Siguro sa Europe or sa US, pwede pa..at saka dun sa mga countries na nangangailangan ng foreign intervention like yung cases ng mga Iraqi bloggers.
One last thing, about being egocentric nung mga tinatawag mong pajama-writers, 'di ba yung mga political bloggers nga ang puno ng self-aggrandizements? Feeling talaga nila ang galing-galing ng opinions nila. As if they have all the solutions to all the problems in this planet.
|
|
- re: by apocalypse on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 @ 10:42:32 AM
- Re: by foxy on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 @ 02:37:24 PM
Re: by mikhell Friday, March 25, 2005 @ 11:17:47 AM
 | speaking of blogs, eto ang nagiisang blog na binabasa ko... www.livejournal.com/users/elyssewell
|
|
I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to death by CHICOISMYNAME Saturday, March 26, 2005 @ 10:19:39 AM
 | "As I see it, all these self-glorifications and me-I-centric musings are nothing but pure masturbation and ego-massage. Such bloggers are then reduced to just another senseless writer – anonymous and voiceless."
Ang kalipunan ng mga salitang iyan ay prutas ng puno sa utak ni Apocalypse ng Peyups. Isang kuyom na palad at gigil na pagkagat sa ibabang labi lamang ang syang aking naging reaksyon, kasabay nito ay ang pag-alingangaw ng mga katagang nabanggit ni Voltaire: "I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to death your right to say it."
Nakalulungkot isipin na ang isang manunulat na tulad ni Apocalypse ang nakapagbitaw ng paturing na ang mangilanngilan na bloggers ay mga "senseless writer." Sa kung ano mang intensyon at tono ng pagkakasulat nito, sigurado akong isang hinanakit ang mararamdaman ng ilang bloggers. Ang pagbloblog ay isa sa kanilang paraan ng kanilang pagpapahayag, pagpaparamdam, pagsalungat sa nakagisnan o maging pagsunod sa iisang direksyon sa agos ng mga pangyayari.
Tunay na ang pagpapahayag ang isa sa dahilan kung bakit ang mga tao, gaano man kababaw ang mga sulatin, ay nagsasatitik ng kanilang mga hinaing, kagustuhan, kalungkutan at kasiyahan, at marami pang iba. Ang pagpapahayag na ito ay protektado ng konstitusyon ng Amerika at maging ng ilang bansa sa buong mundo. Sa Pilipinas, hindi maipagkakailang pilay ang karapatan sa pagpapahayag. Kung ang pagblo blog ang isang paraan kung paano nila masasabi ang kanilang gusto at saloobin, aagawan pa ba natin ng saklay ang mga pilay? Huwag naman sana.
At sa iyong pag-amin na minsan ka nang naging blogger, inaamin mo rin ba na minsan (o maaring hanggang sa ngayon) ay isa ka pa ring "senseless writer"? Nagtatanong lang po.
Wag sanang bigyan ng sariling pakahulugan ang ibang bagay gaya ng pagbablog at mga bloggers, baka bukas makalawa, ikaw na ang bigyan nila ng kahulugan.
Naniniwala ako na maganda ang intensyon mo sa pagkakasulat mo ng artikulong ito, gayumpaman parang hilaw ang mga salita ng iyong hinog na diwa.
|
|
- Re: by apocalypse on Saturday, March 26, 2005 @ 03:47:32 PM
Re: Ang hirap magpost ng article sa net... by gny Saturday, March 26, 2005 @ 10:25:02 PM
 | ..kasi pwedeng makipagdebate sa author at minsan, kailangang sagutin. wala lang. kaya saludo ako kay apocalypse. mahirap maging columnist. hehe.. at least nalilinaw mo ang gusto mong sabihin.
ganun naman ang literature. kung saan-saan na napupunta. iba-iba na ang reception. nasa nagbabasa na kung paano niya tatanggapin.
ang opinyon ko naman, hindi naman masamang gawing online diary ang blog at magsulat tungkol sa mga "kababawan" sa buhay. pero mas maganda nga namang maging politically or socially involved kasi doon mas magiging makahulugan ang existence mo.
ako naman wala pang kamuang-muang sa mundong 'yan kaya gustuhin ko man, wala rin siguro akong maisusulat tungkol 'dyan. dapat siguro i-educate muna ako sa mga mas makabuluhang bagay. :D
|
|
- Re: salamat by apocalypse on Sunday, March 27, 2005 @ 10:43:08 AM
- but by lagsh on Saturday, April 02, 2005 @ 08:25:24 AM
Re: by dd_twdkob Sunday, March 27, 2005 @ 12:04:59 AM
 | blogging, i believe, serves as an outlet for some people. whatever a person writes in his/her own blog is nobody else's business because after all it is his/her own blog. s/he is basically writing it for himself/herself. at least, that's how i see my blog. and when i come across blogs which i don't like, i simply close the window and hop on to the next one. no sense in wanting other blogs to be something i would like.:)
|
|
Re: HAHAHAHA!! NA SLAPSHOCK MO BRO! by lex Sunday, March 27, 2005 @ 12:46:45 PM
 | bato bato sa langit ang tamaan wag magalit ehehehe..
opinyon ni apocalypse ito at may kalayaan din kayong wag pansinin o wag magcomment sa article.
masturbation; ego-massage - yan nga ang blogging.
|
|
Re: No rules by kink_gurl Tuesday, March 29, 2005 @ 01:48:33 PM
 | There are no rules in blogging. But of course if you want people with substance to go there... you got to write something that has substance din. :)
lastboyonearth and I would actually go bloghopping pag minsan then he'll point out or I'll point out which blogs were very well thought of. As in, kahanga-hanga dahil may theme at di sabog yun blog :LOL:.
If some people like having blogs na parang diary, I think that there's choice. But if you want people to keep going back to your blog... it has got to have a gimik. But most importantly, I think a blog should be a reflection of who the person is... ano ba interest niya, what's s/he comfortable to discuss.
A place for masturbation? hehe...Aminado naman akong ganon yun blog ko e. Guess you haven't seen it yet.
|
|
hindi kaya... by Halinaw Tuesday, March 29, 2005 @ 07:01:47 PM
 | kaya maraming nakipagdebate at naimbyerna sa article ni apocalypse ay dahil totoo ang mga sinabi niya at marami siyang egos na natamaan?
at siguro yung iba devil's advocate lang at yung natitira mga writers-for-writing's-sake lang.
hell hath no fury than a UPian's ego scorned.
kaya pabayaan na lang natin sila.
|
|
Re: by chinito Wednesday, March 30, 2005 @ 01:01:54 AM
 | plug:
http://peyups.com/article.khtml?sid=2991
something i wrote two years ago regarding the topic. being a blogger for almost four years now.
anyway, a blog is a tool for an inconceivable number of purposes. but the fact is, not because you find some purpose extremely noble doesn't mean all else is trash. it's highly subjective. it would have been better if you just pointed out what you would like to find in a blog rather than show your annoyance in everything else. but of course, that's just my humble opinion.
kudos kid
|
|
Unfair nga naman. by ribonux Thursday, March 31, 2005 @ 09:10:17 PM
 | Itong artik na ito na i-brand yung mga authors ng personal blogs na senseless.
Eh paano kung yung purpose naman talaga ng blog is to be as pointless as possible?
Halimbawa itong blog
ko para sa mga taong walang magawa sa buhay???
|
|
Re: by TheEqualizer Thursday, March 31, 2005 @ 11:12:57 PM
 | Everyone has the right to "masturbate" because it does not violate any human law.
|
|
- Re: by apocalypse on Sunday, April 03, 2005 @ 12:01:39 PM
Re: hehe by reggyveggy Sunday, April 03, 2005 @ 12:06:30 AM
 | oi, look what you've started here. this would be an endless debate about what a blog is and what it should be. nakakatawa ka, hehe ;p
anyway, wala akong magagawa sa comment mo na masturbatory act or whatever you were saying. nakakatwa ka talaga, pinapa-controversial mo ang isang bagay na dapat di naman, sa tingin ko, sinu-scrutinize ang meaning. o, wag mo ko awayin ha.. hehe
anyway, i am also a blogger (for those who don't know, if may magbasa man nito), and i write whatever i feel like writing: my hopes, dreams, experiences, thoughts about some stupid policy, or my feelings about the pope, etc. wala lang. gusto ko lang sabihin. hehe
i think a blog could be powerful, with or without an audience. with an audience: malay mo, he/she may be experiencing the same thing or a person needs consoling and he/she chanced upon your blog and felt better or you're feeling strongly about something and you may use it as a medium for your convictions or whatever. without: empowering siya kasi you can express what's ur saloobin and the like and e know how refreshing that is to us. pero u might be asking bakit pa dun sa net where ur exposed to evrybody.
ako ba, y do i put up entries? wala lang, i would like to "masturbate" e. hehehe :p
point ko: manggulo, like sa pagblog ko, hehe
|
|
- Re: hehe by apocalypse on Sunday, April 03, 2005 @ 11:56:55 AM
- Re: by reggyveggy on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 @ 08:02:01 PM
hmmm by Styar Tuesday, April 05, 2005 @ 06:42:57 PM
 | <p>what's wrong with being a "pajama writer" ??? (btw, first time i heard it, is that a coined term?)
<p>anyway, as far as i know, some of the main reasons why blogging is enjoying its worldwide popularity right now is because one, it's free and second, it doesn't impose on anyone (what to post, what not post). i mean, inherently, if you are about to start your own blog, you would write something about yourself, right? or anything that interests you. if i'm not interested about politics, why bother.
<p>also, blogging is for all ages so obviously, those owned by teenyboppers are more likely to sound superficial and trivial for the 'intelectual readers'...
<p>i have my own blog too and i may be guilty of being a 'pajama writer' as well. i dunno. but one thing is clear though, i want to maintain my anonymity so as not to be judged by people who would one day call me 'dumb' and 'trivial'...
|
|
- Re: by apocalypse on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 @ 12:16:20 PM
Re: agree/disagree by Nodale Wednesday, April 06, 2005 @ 08:38:43 AM
 | You're right. May blogs na teenybopper. May blogs na nagbibilang ng links and link-ups. May blogs na naghihimasan ng ego.
Pero may mga political, medical, and laywer's blogs din. May blogs na nagfoforward ng cause ng isang race na inaapi.
It looks to me, me, kulang ka lang sa exposure sa ibang blogs.
You say blogs should strive for "social change"? if you had been keeping up with the world beyond your nose, blog pressure has resulted to a resignation of a news executive in the world's leading cable news network, making the MSM feel threatened by blogger. Bloggers who belong to the same school of thought, or political leaning, or profession link up to each other and advocate a certain issue. This is making the conventional media nervous. Whether you think that's a good thing or not, the effect is unmistakeable.
The blogosphere is the ejaculation of an intellectual masturbator. Sure. That should not be something bloggers should offense from. So be it.
Still, go out and smell the coffee, honey. Some of the most analytical and intellectual people I know - I met over the blogosphere.
|
|
- Re: by apocalypse on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 @ 12:03:51 PM
- Re: by Nodale on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 @ 06:14:55 PM
- Re: by apocalypse on Thursday, April 07, 2005 @ 01:03:49 AM
|
|